Minerva vs QuantRocket (2026)
Minerva (cloud research platform whose engine is built around not fooling yourself) and QuantRocket (docker-based python platform for research, backtesting, and live trading via ibkr/alpaca) solve backtesting differently. The table below compares them on verified specs and pricing; full details are in each review.
Side by side
| Minerva | QuantRocket | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 7.2 / 10 | 7.2 / 10 |
| Engine type | event-driven | hybrid |
| Pricing model | subscription | subscription |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Entry price | $99/mo | $0 |
| Languages | no-code, natural language (compiled to a typed signal IR) | Python |
| Asset classes | US equities, US ETFs | stocks, etfs, futures, forex, options (data/execution, limited backtesting) |
| Bundled data | Bundled US equity and ETF bars from roughly April 2016 to June 2026, 1-minute to daily, split-adjusted at storage with CRSP-style backward dividend adjustment. No tick data. No user data import. | Paid license bundles: US Stock Prices (EOD + 1-minute, 2007-present, survivorship-bias-free), IBKR shortable shares, borrow fees and special margin requirements (2018-present, global), Alpaca easy-to-borrow (2019-present). Premium add-ons sold separately: Sharadar point-in-time US fundamentals/prices, EDI global stock prices, Brain sentiment. Free tier: ~30 sample symbols plus US stocks 2007-2011. |
| Finest resolution | 1 minute | 1-minute historical (bundled US stock data); real-time tick/streaming collection via TimescaleDB and WebSockets |
| Live trading | No | Yes |
| Options support | No | Yes |
| Open source | No | No |
Minerva
Cloud research platform whose engine is built around not fooling yourself
QuantRocket
Docker-based Python platform for research, backtesting, and live trading via IBKR/Alpaca
Frequently asked questions
Is Minerva better than QuantRocket?
They target different users. Minerva: someone who cares more about whether a backtest is telling the truth than about how many markets it can reach, and who wants that without writing code. QuantRocket: python-fluent quants trading us equities and futures through interactive brokers who want a self-hosted, data-rigorous research and live-trading stack they fully control Our scores: Minerva 7.2/10, QuantRocket 7.2/10.
Which is cheaper, Minerva or QuantRocket?
Minerva entry pricing: $99/mo (subscription). QuantRocket: $0 (subscription). See each review for full verified pricing tables.
Educational content only, not investment advice. Specs and prices come from each platform's official pages; see the individual reviews for sources and last-verified dates.